A federal judge in Virginia has ruled that a warrant that used Google location history to find people near the scene of a 2019 bank robbery violated the constitutional protection against unreasonable searches
FILE - This aerial drone photo shows the Call Federal Credit Union building, front, Tuesday June 16, 2020, in Midlothian, Va. A warrant that used Google location history to find people near the scene of a 2019 bank robbery violated their constitutional protection against unreasonable searches, a judge has ruled. The decision could make it more difficult for police to use the popular investigative technique, privacy experts say.RICHMOND, Va.
“The warrant simply did not include any facts to establish probable cause to collect such broad and intrusive data from each of these individuals,” Lauck wrote in her ruling. Jennifer Lynch, surveillance litigation director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit digital rights group, said attorneys around the country could cite the ruling in their own cases because it is believed to be the first time a federal district court judge has ruled on the constitutionality of a geofence warrant.
In the Virginia case, a man walked into the Call Federal Credit Union in Midlothian on May 20, 2019, waved a gun and threatened to kill a teller's family if he did not get at least $100,000 in cash. The robber, who was seen on surveillance video holding a cellphone in his hand, escaped with $195,000.
Bank cameras showed the robber came and went from an area where a church worker saw a suspicious person. Chatrie’s location history matched these movements. Google said it is reviewing the court's ruling. “We vigorously protect the privacy of our users, including by pushing back on overly broad requests, while supporting the important work of law enforcement,” the company said in a statement.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Marin judge’s ruling upheld against alleged Gavin Newsom stalkerA judge determined that Ralph Manning Scott, who allegedly talked his way into Gavin Newsom’s home in Kentfield, is mentally incompetent to stand trial.
続きを読む »
Latest Blow to Laws That Ban Candidates With Past FeloniesA judge ruled that Aurora has been violating the State Constitution -- and it's not alone.
続きを読む »
Trump probably broke the law in an effort to obstruct Jan. 6 proceedings, judge says'The illegality of the plan was obvious,' Judge David Carter wrote in a ruling shooting down lawyer John Eastman's bid to keep Jan. 6 documents private.
続きを読む »
Federal judge finds Trump, attorney John Eastman likely committed crimes over 2020 electionA federal judge ruled on Monday that former President Donald Trump and John Eastman, a lawyer who advised him on how to overturn the 2020 election, most likely committed felonies, including obstruc…
続きを読む »
Bosnian court sides with Bitcoin miner in frozen bank account caseCrypto 1 - Bank 0. If you are a bank considering closing accounts related to crypto trading, you might want to think about it twice.
続きを読む »