The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday preserved the ability of people to sue for civil rights violations under an 1871 law as it rejected a bid to prevent an Indiana nursing home resident's family from suing over his care at a government-run facility.
The justices in a 7-2 ruling written by liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson upheld a lower court's ruling that allowed the wife of Gorgi Talevski, a nursing home resident diagnosed with dementia, to sue Indiana municipal corporation Health and Hospital Corp of Marion County over claims it violated his rights.
The lawsuit was filed under a measure known as Section 1983 that was enacted as part of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, a law passed in the post-Civil War Reconstruction Era to protect the rights of Black Americans. Section 1983 gives people the power to sue in federal court when state officials violate their constitutional or statutory rights.
In a 2019 lawsuit, his wife, Ivanka Talevski, said Talevski was subjected to harmful psychotropic drugs and unlawfully transferred to an all-male facility. He died in 2021, while the litigation was pending. A law called the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act places limits the use of physical or chemical restraints and on transferring patients. Talevski's wife contended her husband's rights under it were violated.
President Joe Biden's administration had urged the justices to reject a broad limitation on lawsuits pursued under Section 1983. But it had also argued that the federal nursing home statute provided comprehensive administrative processes and remedies that made a lawsuit unnecessary by exposing nursing homes that violate residents' rights to financial penalties and the termination of their Medicaid funding.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
The Supreme Court’s Damper on the Right to StrikeIn a near-unanimous opinion, the Justices made it easier for employers to sue labor unions for damages caused by a work stoppage.
続きを読む »
Voting rights to student loan forgiveness: 5 key Supreme Court rulings coming soonIt's crunch time for the U.S. Supreme Court, as the justices must issue opinions on dozens of cases before they break for recess around the end of June or beginning of July.
続きを読む »
The Supreme Court’s Gun Rights Decision Is Causing Confusion In State LegislaturesThe uncertainty about which gun restrictions are — or aren’t — allowed is a huge headache for lawmakers looking to serve their constituents.
続きを読む »
New Supreme Court financial reports set for release amid increased ethics scrutinyThe Supreme Court's recently restated commitment to ethics standards will be put to the test on Wednesday as the judiciary releases annual financial disclosure reports listing earnings, assets, gifts and stock holdings.
続きを読む »
Voting rights to student loan forgiveness: 5 key Supreme Court rulings coming soonIt’s crunch time for the U.S. Supreme Court: The justices must issue opinions on dozens of cases before they break for recess in late June or July. Among the rulings yet to be announced are in cases involving affirmative action, LGBTQ+ rights and student debt relief.
続きを読む »
Will Brazil’s Supreme Court deal a blow to Amazon protection efforts?Brazil’s Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling this week that could determine the fate of controversial legislation that conservationists fear will undermine efforts to protect the nation’s forests.
続きを読む »