Donald Trump, his campaign, and his legal team have long sought to blur the lines between politics and the law, but they are more aggressively litigating his defense against special counsel Jack Smith's case alleging he tried to overturn the 2020 election.
But although the strategy, including calling for cameras in the courtroom before Friday's hearing regarding restrictions the federal government is hoping to place on Trump, appears to be helping the former president amid the 2024 Republican presidential primary, it may hinder him in next year's general election.Trump's attorneys are publicly posturing concerning the unlikely prospect of Judge Tanya Chutkan permitting cameras in her Washington, D.
"Given the historic national importance of these cases, the American people deserve to witness how the trials are conducted, the strength of the evidence, and the credibility of witnesses first-hand," Schiff wrote in an email-building note Wednesday. "The government strained to creatively indict a former president," he said."It will be hard for the government to put lipstick on this pig and hide the fact that the Biden administration is stretching to target and prosecute a political opponent."
For Northeastern University political science professor and chairman Costas Panagopoulos, Trump's trial by media strategy is likely to consolidate his base and boost his fundraising.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Jack Smith Obtains Search Warrant for Donald Trump's Twitter AccountTwitter and special counsel Jack Smith's office engaged in a legal battle over whether to inform Trump about the search warrant. The DC Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld a district court ruling that prohibited Twitter from notifying Trump.
続きを読む »
Donald Trump trial: Jack Smith proposes date for Jan. 6 investigation case to beginSpecial counsel Jack Smith is proposing a Jan. 2, 2024, trial date for the case against former President Donald Trump for his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election.
続きを読む »
Truth Social Post Prompts Jack Smith to Ask Judge to Prevent Trump from Releasing Discovery EvidenceSpecial Counsel Jack Smith on Friday asked a judge to issue a protective order in the case against former President Donald Trump over his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election after Trump made a post on Truth Social.
続きを読む »
What Jack Smith actually wants protected in citing Trump’s threatening postProsecutors seek to prevent the improper dissemination or use of discovery materials in the 2020 election case. Jack Smith's team cites Trump's threatening post, emphasizing the importance of the proposed order in protecting witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him.
続きを読む »
Trump claims Jack Smith's protective order would violate free speechFormer President Donald Trump rejects the proposed protective order by special counsel Jack Smith, arguing that it would infringe upon his freedom of speech. Trump suggests that Smith should be bound by a protective order instead, citing alleged illegal leaks by prosecutors.
続きを読む »
No, Jack Smith doesn’t have to prove Trump knew he lostStrange as it may seem, why Trump allegedly committed these crimes is beside the point. Without ever showing that Trump knew he had lost the 2020 election. Yes, Smith did spill a good deal of ink including allegations that, if proven, would demonstrate that Trump was well aware that Biden had defeated him, and that his statements to the contrary were knowing lies. But those allegations merely help Smith tell us, and eventually a jury, a consistent story.
続きを読む »