Commentary: The Supreme Court is an engine of repression whose decisions on affirmative action, student debt relief, and abortion rights amount to a war on Black women and girls, writes Marley Dias
By failing to protect abortion rights, the courts opened the floodgates for unsafe, unregulated abortion — rather than reform needed to heal the wounds of centuries of reproductive injustice.
The Supreme Court’s decisions come in the context of historic firsts, both for the court and for Harvard. When Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson and President Claudine Gay made history as the first Black women to be appointed to the Supreme Court and Harvard, respectively, Black women gained a needed seat at the table. But the decisions have shown that we need more than seats at the table — we need systems that recognize, rather than ignore, structural racism, and actively work to address them.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Pressley, Ocasio-Cortez call for changes to the Supreme CourtThe calls come after the Supreme Court handed down a slate of decisions decried by many Democrats.
続きを読む »
Michael Imperioli forbids 'bigots and homophobes' from watching his work following Supreme Court ruling | CNNActor Michael Imperioli has something to say about the Supreme Court’s Friday ruling in favor of a Christian web designer who refuses to create websites to celebrate same-sex weddings.
続きを読む »
Trump Praises Supreme Court Decisions at Rally in South Carolina(Bloomberg) -- Donald Trump praised Supreme Court rulings that ended affirmative action in college admissions and a student debt-relief program, as well as limited LGBTQ protections, touting his role in installing the court’s conservative majority as he campaigned in South Carolina on Saturday.Most Read from BloombergFrench Riots Begin to Abate Even as Economic Costs MountIt’s Getting a Lot Harder to Chase the Stock Rally From Here OnDizzying Bond Moves Put 4% Yield in Play to Win Over Investors
続きを読む »
Clarence Page: Supreme Court pointed to affirmative action optionsThe Supreme Court scrapped race as a factor in affirmative action college admissions, but the Roberts court pointed the way to economic class as a better remedy.
続きを読む »
Analysis | Supreme Court delivered big conservative wins, and a mixed messageAnalysis: A trio of ideologically divided, 6-3 decisions showed the abiding dominance of the court’s conservative supermajority. But they were among only a handful of decisions — five, as opposed to 14 last term — in which those ideological lines held.
続きを読む »
Up Close for July 2, 2023: The aftermath of the Supreme Court's affirmative action rulingOn this episode of Up Close, we talk to New York Congressman Hakeem Jeffries about the Supreme Court's decision to gut the practice of affirmative action in college admissions.
続きを読む »