New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. (NYSRPA) v City of New York is the case gun-rights advocates have been waiting for since 2008
STRONGER GUN-CONTROL laws are a priority for the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates. All favour universal background checks and a renewal of the ban on assault weapons, which expired in 2004. Several contenders support compulsory federal licences for gun-owners and buy-back programmes, whether voluntary or mandatory. But any new laws aimed at alleviating what Joe Biden calls the “public-health epidemic” of gun violence would face a reckoning in America’s federal courts.
There are other problems with New York’s erstwhile rule, the plaintiffs say: it was precluded by the constitution's Commerce Clause, which prohibits state and local governments from discriminating against businesses from other states. By limiting its residents to a handful of in-city ranges, and preventing non-residents from gaining access to them, NYSRPA writes, the city promoted “a degree of economic balkanisation that violates the Commerce Clause and related constitutional guarantees”.
Even so, New York prevailed at both the district court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which found that since there is “at least one” shooting range in each of the city’s five boroughs—and “these facilities are quite substantial”—the rule imposed no genuine burden on gun-toting New Yorkers. Why did New York retreat after two consecutive wins in federal courts? Eyeing the recently bolstered conservative majority on the Supreme Court, the city did not fancy its chances of a third victory—and worried that poking the hornet’s nest could inspire a reaction foreclosing more meaningful forms of gun control.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
U.S. Supreme Court weighs challenge to New York gun transport limitsThe U.S. Supreme Court will hear its first major gun rights case in nearly a dec...
続きを読む »
Gun safety groups brace for Supreme Court moves on 2nd AmendmentFor the first time in nearly a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday will consider Second Amendment rights in a closely watched case that gun safety advocates worry could set a dangerous new precedent.
続きを読む »
Gun control advocates nervous as Supreme Court takes up first 2nd Amendment case in a decadeUS Supreme Court set to wade into gun control debate for the first time in nearly a decade on Monday, hearing a dispute over an NYC gun restriction that could have major implications for gun rights nationwide.
続きを読む »
New York Case to Test Supreme Court’s Position on Gun RightsThe Supreme Court on Monday will hear its most significant Second Amendment case in nearly a decade, testing whether and how far its conservative majority, now bolstered by two Trump appointees, is ready to move on gun rights.
続きを読む »
Guns: Supreme Court may bolster Second Amendment in New York case
続きを読む »
Gun safety groups brace for Supreme Court moves on 2nd AmendmentFor the first time in nearly a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday will consider Second Amendment rights in a closely watched case that gun safety advocates worry could set a dangerous new precedent. The case involves a New York City law that prohibited licensed gun owners from taking their handguns
続きを読む »