The upcoming Supreme Court decision could result in Trump's finances becoming public.
The justices' rulings will carry political, legal and constitutional implications for the president, Congress and law enforcement officials who have argued the records could reveal evidence of criminal wrongdoing or lead to new legislation on Capitol Hill.Trump, acting through his personal legal team, has refused to comply with subpoenas from three House committees controlled by Democrats, as well as Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.
The House Committee on Oversight and Reform issued a subpoena to Mazars USA, Trump's accounting firm, more than a year ago seeking financial records from the president, his family business, a trust and the company that runs Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. Thus far, two federal courts have upheld the subpoena.
Trump's former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, testified before Congress that as a private citizen, Trump routinely overstated or understated his holdings for financial gain. The panel wants to compare eight years of financial documents to Cohen's testimony and government disclosures. The House Financial Services Committee and the House Intelligence Committee issued subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One more than a year ago seeking records from Trump, his three oldest children and the Trump Organization. The panels are probing risky lending practices by major financial institutions and efforts by Russia to influence U.S. elections. They, too, have been upheld twice in lower courts.
The Manhattan district attorney's subpoenas came later as part of a criminal probe of hush-money payments that Cohen said were made to adult film star Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, who claimed they had affairs with Trump that he has denied. Once again, two lower courts upheld the subpoenas.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Supreme Court set to issue opinions Thursday on Trump's financial recordsThe cases tackle whether Trump can stop the House of Representatives from getting his financial and banking records from his accounting firm and banks as well as whether the President can block a subpoena from a New York prosecutor seeking his tax returns.
続きを読む »
Supreme Court deals major blow to Keystone XL projectThe Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for several pipeline projects to proceed under a fast-track permitting process but excluded the controversial Keystone XL expansion from their ruling, forcing major delays.
続きを読む »
NCAA will ask Supreme Court to take case about benefits that college athletes can receiveThe NCAA said it will ask the Supreme Court to take up a case in which a district judge and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals have ruled that the NCAA cannot have association-wide limits on education-related benefits that college athletes can receive.
続きを読む »
Supreme Court rules 'faithless electors' can't go rogue at Electoral College.PeteWilliamsNBC: “The majority opinion said when the Constitution gave the authority to appoint electors the power of appointment includes the power to set conditions. And one of those conditions is that they will vote as the state does.”
続きを読む »
Opinion: Robocall case exposes a troubling free-speech split on the Supreme CourtOpinion: Robocall case exposes a troubling free-speech split on the Supreme Court (via latimesopinion)
続きを読む »
Supreme Court says Trump administration can let religious employers deny birth control coverage under ObamacareSupreme Court says Trump administration can let religious employers deny birth control coverage
続きを読む »