Scientists shouldn’t debate gaslighters, argues hholdenthorp in a new Editor's Blog post. 'Absurd statements … are a trap for scientists.'
exploded with a controversy surrounding an invitation to prominent vaccine scientist Peter Hotez to debate anti-vax charlatan and spoiler presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr on the podcast,. There was an immediate rally around Hotez by scientists and celebrities on Twitter and lots of discussion about why this invitation is a classic anti-science setup.
Hucksters like RFK Jr are skilled at flooding the zone with garbage. Kennedy recently told Rogan that Wi-Fi could. Absurd statements like this are a trap for scientists. A scientist wants to explain how conservation of energy works and why Kennedy’s assertion violates just about every principle there is in chemistry and physics. This approach sets up two huge problems. First, it gives RFK’s garbage equal footing with principles that have been established by centuries of science.
I’ve fallen into this trap a few times myself. I went to the Heterodox Academy to be on a panel that also included the conservative pundits Richard Lowry and Batya Ungar-Sargon, who rattled off all kinds of misinformation about COVID-19. Each thing they said would have taken 15 minutes to refute based on the evidence. So, I picked one and did the best I could. But my knowledge of the evidence and burning desire to cite it all was no match for their rhetorical skills.
When scientists refuse these “debates,” the other side gets the opportunity to say that they are turning them down for fear of being challenged. The opposition can claim to be “just asking questions,” even though they don’t care about the answers. But these reactions are preferable to giving them a platform.
The latest kerfuffle is another reminder of something important that science has not solved: There are few figures who are rhetorical matches for merchants of doubt like RFK Jr. Most scientists aren’t prepared to take on his firehose of nonsense. The scientific community desperately needs equally skilled pundits to defend science.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Letters to the Editor — Godley, school safety, Liz Cheney, Allen footage, anti-DEI lawRe: “Paxton defenders should welcome Senate trial — Legislator who led investigative committee explains its decision,” by Andrew S. Murr, Sunday Opinion....
続きを読む »
Blake Northcott, Editor-in-Chief of Massive, The New Name For WhatNotBlake Northcott, Editor-in-Chief of Massive, The New Name For WhatNot whatnot blakenorthcott whatnot whatnotpub Massivepublish BlakeNorthcott KevinRoditeli mrmarkmillar SeanMurphyArt
続きを読む »
Vimeo's New AI-Powered Editor Promises to Simplify Video CreationVimeo has rolled out a new AI video editor that can simplify editing for everyone.
続きを読む »
Letters to the Editor - Grid reliability, Chris Christie, Paul Ryan, PGA golf, veteransI am a native Texan and lifelong conservative voter. Our state Legislature has been focused on electric grid reliability. This is a very important topic....
続きを読む »
Pangaia Teams With Fashion Editor Robert RabensteinerA leisurely after-bath capsule collection co-created by the brand and Rabensteiner dropped this week.
続きを読む »
Stuck in the propeller of Titanic, former ABC News science editor recalls submersible trip to wreckageNEW YORK — (NEW YORK) -- As the search for the missing Titanic tour submersible and its five passengers continues, the dangers of venturing 13,000 feet down to the ocean floor to see the wreckage of the infamous sunken ship are coming to light. A former ABC News science editor knows them all too well after a voyage to the wreckage more than 20 years ago went awry.
続きを読む »