SINGAPORE — Questions on the code of conduct for ministers and a perceived conflict of interest dominated the debate in Parliament on Monday (July 3) surrounding the rental of Ridout Road properties by Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam and Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan.
Over the six-hour debate, 19 Members of Parliament posed supplementary questions on issues such as whether it was appropriate for the independent review to be led by Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean.
Responding to this, Mr Teo said that a conflict of interest arises when a person’s duty or responsibility from the office he occupies conflicts with his own personal interests – and that a conflict of interest could be “actual” or “potential”, with the latter arising when a conflicted person is in a position to, but has yet to make, such a decision.
Ms Sylvia Lim of the Workers’ Party cited the code of conduct, which states that ministers should not enter into transactions where financial interest might “conceivably” come into conflict with their public duties. To this, Mr Teo said: “I’m very happy to hear Mr Pritam Singh say that nobody is alleging corruption. And so, my take is that this House actually concurs that there’s no wrongdoing. There's no corruption. There's no abuse of power.
“The reason why we are ranked as highly as we are, and the reason why this Government is not corrupt, is because we take these things seriously.”Several MPs, including MP for Potong Pasir Single Member Constituency Sitoh Yih Pin, also raised questions on whether it was “appropriate” for Mr Teo to lead the independent review.“I am not involved in the rental transactions of both these properties.
In response, Mr Teo said that the Auditor-General looks at things dealing with audits, such as the misappropriation or loss of funds. The Sengkang GRC MP noted that the lease was renewed in October last year, at an increased rental rate of S$20,000, up from S$19,000 – about a 5 per cent increase in rent.
Addressing this, Mr Teo said that the idea of the bungalows being leased at a “relatively cheap rate” was a “misconception” which should be completely dispelled.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Shanmugam refutes claim that he fled community event due to Ridout Road questions - Singapore NewsMr Shanmugam said he had to attend four events in Chong Pang.
続きを読む »
Ridout Road parliament debate: MPs raise questions on conflict of interest, code of conductSenior Minister Teo Chee Hean also addressed a query on whether it was appropriate for him to head an independent review of the matter.
続きを読む »
Watch live: Parliament debate on ministers' rental of Ridout Road bungalowsParliamentary questions have been filed on the two state properties rented by Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan and Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam.
続きを読む »
Live: Ridout Road bungalows parliamentary debate — speeches by MinistersIn Parliament today (July 3), the black and white bungalows at Ridout Road take the spotlight as four ministers deliver speeches on this topic.
続きを読む »
Ridout Road parliamentary debate: Shanmugam, Balakrishnan explain why they rented bungalows, undertook major renovation worksSINGAPORE — Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam had decided to rent the black-and-white bungalow at 26 Ridout Road as he was putting his family home up for sale, he told Parliament on Monday (July 3), adding that he was not making money from the arrangement.
続きを読む »