Opinion | The Supreme Court’s Elections Muddle

From WSJopinion: So much for the radical Supreme Court. A 6-3 majority rejected in Moore v. Harper the argument advanced by some conservatives that the U.S. Constitution bars state courts from reviewing Congressional maps and voting laws.

Journal Editorial Report: The Dobbs decision overturned the politics of abortion. Images: AP/Zuma Press Composite: Mark Kelly

So much for the radical Supreme Court. A 6-3 majority on Tuesday rejected the argument advanced by some conservatives that the U.S. Constitution bars state courts from reviewing Congressional maps and voting laws. The result isn’t the runaway victory that progressives claim, but it will lead to more election-law controversies.Continue reading your article with

このニュースをすぐに読めるように要約しました。ニュースに興味がある場合は、ここで全文を読むことができます。 続きを読む:

WSJ /  🏆 98. in US

日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し

Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。

SCOTUS Sides With Democracy in Moore v. HarperThe Supreme Court just decided a case at the center of efforts to overturn the 2020 election, and it’s more bad news for Trump.
続きを読む »

Opinion | The ‘King’ and the Supreme CourtFrom WSJopinion: The mixed opinions in U.S. v. Texas deserve more attention because of their implications for executive power
続きを読む »