The plaintiffs in the case claimed that the 'mandatory quarantine,' along with interstate travel restrictions listed in an earlier version of the order, violated their rights.
in Michigan, where there are 40,399 confirmed cases and the death toll has reached 3,670, according to data from Johns Hopkins.
"But those liberty interests are, and always have been, subject to society's interests—society being our fellow residents," said Court of Claims Judge Christopher M. Murray. Murray stated that issuing injunctive relief"would not serve the public interest, despite the temporary harm to plaintiffs' constitutional rights."
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Coronavirus In Ohio: DeWine Outlines Plan To Begin Reopening Businesses On FridayBeginning Friday, Ohio will allow some health procedures to take place, and dentists and veterinarians can reopen. On Monday, manufacturers and offices can reopen. Restaurants, bars, barbershops and salons will remain closed indefinitely. (WOSU)
続きを読む »
When will California reopen? Here's a reality check from across the stateWhile promising to review requests to modify the state's stay-at-home order, Gov. Gavin Newsom has been hesitant to pin any action to a specific date.
続きを読む »
Judge grants Illinois lawmaker a personal exemption from state's stay-at-home orderAn Illinois county judge has ruled that a state lawmaker is personally exempt from Gov. J.B. Pritzker's stay-at-home order aimed at stemming the spread of coronavirus.
続きを読む »
L.A. County working to ease stay-at-home order by MayPublic Health Department Director Barbara Ferrer said Tuesday there were no plans to extend the current order, but as the deadline approaches, officials will reevaluate what is best for the county.
続きを読む »