Unless the Supreme Court acts sooner, the lower court’s ruling invalidating the homeschool statutes takes effect July 1.
A high-stakes battle over a popular form of homeschooling reached the Alaska Supreme Court Thursday, as the justices grilled attorneys representing the state, public school families and a group of parents who use state funding to send their children to private schools.key to the correspondence school system as it exists today. The laws relaxed state regulations on how correspondence school learning plans are constructed and how cash payments to families, known as allotments, can be spent.
“And where a fundamental federal right exists, the state is not only barred from flatly prohibiting the exercise of that right, the state also may not condition the receipt of a benefit on foregoing the exercise of that right,” West said.“Because of the Free Exercise clause , the court has looked and said you can’t deny a benefit to an entity based solely on its religious status. That’s discrimination against … religion or religious practice.
Kendall was paraphrasing Gov. Mike Dunleavy, who proposed the homeschool reforms while in the Alaska Senate. Former West Virginia Solicitor General Elbert Lin represented the state. He told the justices the lower court’s ruling had gone too far. He argued that there was a wide range of permissible spending under the allotment law — including purchases at retailers like Target or Amazon — and that the court should allow the law to stand.
“They don’t have a role to play in the approval or disapproval reimbursements for the allotment spending,” Lin said. “They can’t direct the districts as part of that process to either approve or disapprove a particular reimbursement.”
Alaska Homeschool Alottment Alaska Supreme Court
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Justices grill attorneys as correspondence school case reaches Alaska Supreme CourtThe justices are considering an appeal of a decision that ruled two 2014 laws key to the correspondence school system unconstitutional.
続きを読む »
Yes, there is a federal recusal law for Supreme Court justicesHere are the top stories around San Diego County for the morning of Thursday, May 9th. For the latest news, weather and sports, head to: https://www.cbs8.com/
続きを読む »
State Supreme Court justices hear arguments on constitutionality of state’s correspondence homeschool programAlaska State Supreme Court justices heard arguments Thursday supporting and opposing a superior court judge’s ruling parts of the State’s correspondence homeschool program are unconstitutional.
続きを読む »
Supreme Court Justices Jackson and Alito feud over Idaho decisionPolitical News and Conservative Analysis About Congress, the President, and the Federal Government
続きを読む »
Neil Gorsuch Compares Liberal Supreme Court Justices to 'Picky Child'Gorsuch criticized his liberal colleagues' approach to the law in a lengthy concurring opinion on Thursday.
続きを読む »
Supreme Court Justices Put Ideology Over Impartiality, Poll FindsPoll finds Americans don't trust the Supreme Court to remain impartial and are influenced by their own personal ideologies.
続きを読む »