An Arapahoe County judge has ruled against a lawsuit to remove Aurora's divisive strong mayor proposal from the ballot — but the fight's not over yet.
"Obviously we're disappointed, but the door has not been closed," Richardson tellsBefore being struck down by District Court Judge Elizabeth Volz, Richardson's lawsuit was challenging the strong mayor proposal on two different fronts: the accuracy of the"ballot language that will be presented to voters," he says; and that it violates Colorado's single-subject rule requiring that questions on a ballot only affect one specific issue.
Although Aurora Mayor Mike Coffman denied any involvement for months, he eventually revealed to the public that he had been supporting the campaign since early July when the strong mayor proposal petition was determined to have enough signatures to go on the November 7 ballot. Aurora lawyer and former city councilman Charlie Richardson is suing to make sure voters know the details of an upcoming ballot measure.Richardson's lawsuit contested that the strong mayor proposal didn't just affect the powers of Aurora's mayors, but also changed term limits and the abilities of the City Council.
"If this thing does pass — which we hope it doesn't — we would have a single-subject challenge after the election," Richardson says."That's been preserved." Even if the judge had accepted Richardson's alternative, the question still would have to be on the ballot though, the former city attorney notes — so the challenge to its language was never a critical part of the fight."If we had won the substitute language argument, it would still have gone to a vote," he says."So I don't think this is a loss with a capital L. Nevertheless, we're disappointed.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Federal Judge Rules AI Images Cannot be Copyrighted, Contrasts it to PhotosPhotographers 1 Robots 0
続きを読む »
US judge rules in favor of human ingenuity, denies copyright for AI artA U.S. judge has ruled that AI-created art lacks copyright protection, impacting AI’s use of copyrighted content.
続きを読む »
Judge rules that AI-generated art isn't copyrightable, since it lacks human authorshipA federal judge has agreed with US government officials that a piece of artificial intelligence-generated art isn't eligible for copyright protection in the country since there was no human authorship involved..
続きを読む »
Judge Rules AI-Generated Art Not Protected by Copyright Law: 'Human Authorship Is a Bedrock Requirement'A federal judge has ruled that art that was wholly created by artificial intelligence technology is not protected by copyright law -- a decision that could have far-reaching implications for Hollywood as studios continue to adopt AI as a creative tool.
続きを読む »
Judge rules that AI-generated art can't be copyrightedU.S. District Judge Beryl Howell ruled that 'human authorship is a bedrock requirement of copyright.'
続きを読む »
Catholic apple farmer unfairly barred from Michigan public market, judge rulesDeclining to host same-sex weddings at an apple orchard is not enough to disqualify a Catholic vendor from the farmer’s market in East Lansing, Michigan, a federal district judge ruled Monday.
続きを読む »