The Department of Justice responded swiftly after Trump's defense team proposed expanding the protective order request filed last week in the January 6 case.
that Smith's proposed protective order was an infringement on the former president's First Amendment rights, and was much too broad and restrictive. Instead, Trump's lawyers gave their own proposals, countering the DOJ's call to prohibit evidence deemed"sensitive" from being discussed publicly.
Special Counsel Jack Smith is shown on August 1, 2023, in Washington, D.C. Smith is asking the court to toss former President Donald Trump's protective order counterproposal, which would broaden access to evidence.Smith responded quickly to Trump's counterproposal Monday evening, stating that the government's first order was"a standard, reasonable order that will streamline the flow of discovery to the defendant while preserving the integrity of these proceedings.
"The defendant has proposed an unreasonable order to facilitate his plan to litigate this case in the media, to the detriment of litigating this case in the courtroom," Smith wrote in his response, which was obtained byFederal prosecutors specifically homed in on instances where Trump's legal team proposed changes that would expand who could have access to the evidence involved in the case.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Trump claims Jack Smith's protective order would violate free speechFormer President Donald Trump rejects the proposed protective order by special counsel Jack Smith, arguing that it would infringe upon his freedom of speech. Trump suggests that Smith should be bound by a protective order instead, citing alleged illegal leaks by prosecutors.
続きを読む »
Trump rejects Jack Smith's protective order as 'overbroad,' violation of First AmendmentFormer President Donald Trump's attorneys oppose special counsel Jack Smith's proposal for a protective order in the case related to the 2020 election, claiming it is 'overbroad' and violates the First Amendment.
続きを読む »
Truth Social Post Prompts Jack Smith to Ask Judge to Prevent Trump from Releasing Discovery EvidenceSpecial Counsel Jack Smith on Friday asked a judge to issue a protective order in the case against former President Donald Trump over his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election after Trump made a post on Truth Social.
続きを読む »
What Jack Smith actually wants protected in citing Trump’s threatening postProsecutors seek to prevent the improper dissemination or use of discovery materials in the 2020 election case. Jack Smith's team cites Trump's threatening post, emphasizing the importance of the proposed order in protecting witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him.
続きを読む »
No, Jack Smith doesn’t have to prove Trump knew he lostStrange as it may seem, why Trump allegedly committed these crimes is beside the point. Without ever showing that Trump knew he had lost the 2020 election. Yes, Smith did spill a good deal of ink including allegations that, if proven, would demonstrate that Trump was well aware that Biden had defeated him, and that his statements to the contrary were knowing lies. But those allegations merely help Smith tell us, and eventually a jury, a consistent story.
続きを読む »
Aileen Cannon asks Trump aide to explain Jack Smith's grand juryWalt Nauta, along with Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira, was charged in the classified documents case for trying to obstruct the federal attempt to retrieve the classified material from Trump's Florida home.
続きを読む »