A leading House Democrat is preparing a constitutional amendment in response to the Supreme Court’s landmark immunity ruling. Rep. Joseph Morelle of New York says he is seeking to reverse the court's decision “and ensure that no president is above the law.
FILE - Rep. Joe Morelle, D-N.Y., questions a witness during a Committee on House Administration hearing about noncitizen voting in U.S. elections on Capitol Hill, May 16, 2024 in Washington. Morelle is preparing a constitutional amendment in response to the Supreme Court’s landmark immunity ruling. Rep.
The outcome all but ensures the federal cases against Trump will not be resolved before the November election when he faces a likely rematch with President “This amendment will guarantee that no public officer of the United States — including the president — is able to evade the accountability that any other American would face for violating our laws,” Morelle wrote in a letter to colleagues this week.
Another Democrat, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, said Monday she planned to file articles of impeachment against the justices over the ruling, which she said represents “an assault on American democracy.”
Courts Supreme Court Of The United States Joe Biden P John Roberts United States Government Government And Politics District Of Columbia
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
US Supreme Court Latest: Court sends Trump’s immunity case back to lower courtThe New Black View
続きを読む »
US Supreme Court Latest: Court sends Trump’s immunity case back to lower courtThe justices take the bench today to release their last few opinions of the term, including a closely watched case: Whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from criminal prosecution for …
続きを読む »
Florida Democrat Says 'Trump Was Right' After Supreme Court RulingThe Supreme Court overturned a Trump-era ban on 'bump stocks' Friday.
続きを読む »
In a win for conservatives, Supreme Court limits use of SEC in-house tribunalsSEC v. Jarkesy is one of several Supreme Court cases this term challenging the power of federal agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission.
続きを読む »
U.S. Supreme Court Says No More In-House Tribunals for the SEC, Other Federal RegulatorsCheyenne Ligon is a CoinDesk news reporter with a focus on crypto regulation and policy. She has no significant crypto holdings.
続きを読む »
Supreme Court faults SEC's use of in-house judges in latest curbs on agency powersThe Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in favor of a challenge to the Securities and Exchange Commission's in-house enforcement of investor protection laws in certain proceedings, dealing a setback to the agency.
続きを読む »