Google's switch from API specification Manifest V2 to V3 cripples Chrome extensions and makes them less effective, including ad blocking.
And even then, if those content-filtering extensions have been updated to meet Google 's latest specifications and requirements, the add-ons may not work as well or as comprehensively as they did previously. Today those Chrome extensions by and large adhere to an API specification known as Manifest V2: that's what they use to, for example, inspect pages for stuff to filter out.
Googlers feel that API putsin the hands of extension developers: someone could make an add-on that offers to do things like block annoying ads on a page, and then later use those powers to steal or manipulate sensitive data on your internet profiles., which has been supported by Chrome for a while now: it's an alterative way for extensions to drill into pages and filter out bad content, for instance. Google says V3 is safer - giving users more protection from wayward extensions - but somethe switch from V2 to V3 cripples their extensions and makes them less effective. That would mean less effective ad blockin
Google API Switch Chrome Extensions Ad Blocking
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Google Chrome to Phase Out Third-Party CookiesGoogle's Chrome browser will gradually phase out third-party cookies, starting with one percent of users. This marks a major transition for the internet economy.
続きを読む »
Google bins integrity API that looked more than a bit like horrible DRM for websitesChocolate Factory to focus on more limited attestation for Android WebViews
続きを読む »
Google gives up on that API that looked more than a bit like DRM for websitesInstead, Chocolate Factory focuses on more limited attestation for Android WebViews
続きを読む »
Fortnite maker Epic Games takes Google to courtGoogle faces another anti-trust trial - this time about its Google Play store
続きを読む »
Google Faces Lawsuit Over Misleading Privacy MenuGoogle has been battling a lawsuit for three years over allegations that its privacy menu is misleading and fails to provide adequate protection. The lawsuit focuses on a setting called Web & App Activity (WAA) and a subsetting known as sWAA, which supposedly extends privacy protection to include Chrome history and activity from sites, apps, and devices that use Google services. Despite claims that turning off WAA stops data collection, the complaint alleges that Google continues to save users' data. The case has become part of the US government's antitrust trial against Google, with sensitive documents being redacted or sealed.
続きを読む »
Emmerdale's Samantha Giles cast a love spell to 'manifest' her husbandIt's all about belief, apparently.
続きを読む »