In a letter to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, attorney Mark Paoletta says emails between Ginni Thomas and attorney John Eastman about the 2020 election results provide no basis for his client to testify.
In a letter to the committee, attorney Mark Paoletta says emails between Thomas and attorney John Eastman about the 2020 election results provide no basis for his client to testify. Emails from the committee show Thomas communicated with Eastman about unfounded claims the 2020 presidential election was fraudulent.
Paoletta said the same goes for text messages between Thomas and former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. Paoletta claimed there is no evidence Thomas discussed the work of the U.S. Supreme Court, where her husband serves as a justice.Thomas initially said she was eager to clear her name. However, Paoletta said he can recommend his client sit for an interview without more information from the committee.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Attorney For Ginni Thomas Says There’s No Reason For Her To Speak To Jan. 6 Panel“There is no story to uncover here,” the lawyer wrote to the House select committee investigating the U.S. Capitol riot.
続きを読む »
Excerpts From Ginni Thomas’ Emails Attempting To Overturn The 2020 ElectionTo Ginni Thomas: “You are powerful. You are incredible. You can do anything. Believe in yourself and your own abilities. You can rock this, girlie!”
続きを読む »
Hillary Clinton rips Clarence Thomas: 'He's been a person of grievance’Hillary Clinton got personal with her disparagement of Justice Clarence Thomas on Tuesday, sniping that her former law school classmate was always a man of 'resentment, grievance, [and] anger.'
続きを読む »
Leo Terrell slams Lori Lightfoot for ‘F Clarence Thomas’ remark: 'She sent a coded message'Civil Rights attorney Leo Terrell responds to Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot’s profane statement toward Justice Clarence Thomas following abortion ruling.
続きを読む »
Despite headlines, Clarence Thomas doesn’t threaten contraception or homosexualityChill out, people. Despite media (mis)reporting to the contrary, neither a Supreme Court majority nor Justice Clarence Thomas individually comes close to wanting, as one headline put it, to “ban contraception [and] homosexuality.”
続きを読む »