The Supreme Court decision Thursday to limit how the Environmental Protection Agency may regulate carbon dioxide emissions could make an already grave situation worse for those most affected by air pollution and climate change, community residents and advocates fear
to move the U.S. away from burning coal for electricity"may be sensible for the crisis of the day."
The Supreme Court decision"denies relief to Black and other communities of color as well as poor communities disproportionately exposed to power plant pollution and vulnerable to climate change,” Monique Harden, assistant director of law and policy at the Deep South Center for Environmental Justice told the Associated Press.
That corridor touches New Orleans and Baton Rouge, two cities that have experienced intense storm surges and hurricanes worsened by climate change over the last 20 years. And Baton Rouge has a power plant,Thousands of miles west the Supreme Court decision was just as alarming to Darryl Molina Sarmiento, executive director of Communities for a Better Environment.
On a press briefing with the Green New Deal Network, a nationwide coalition of environmental organizations, U.S. Rep. Jamaal Bowman expressed concern that the decision could set a precedent that will limit regulatory agencies in their ability to protect human health.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Biden slams Supreme Court EPA decision: 'I will not relent'President Joe Biden issued a statement slamming Thursday's Supreme Court ruling that limits the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate power plants' greenhouse gas emissions.
続きを読む »
Pa. environmental groups assail Supreme Court EPA rulingReaction was swift from the largest environmental groups in Pennsylvania: The Supreme Court's sweeping ruling blocking the EPA from broadly regulating carbon emissions is a major blow to efforts to address climate change.
続きを読む »
Supreme Court Casually Mentions Nation Now Divided Into Six Provinces Ruled By Conservative JusticesWASHINGTON—In a tangential footnote appended to its 6-3 decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, the Supreme Court casually declared Thursday that the nation had been divided into six provinces, each of which would be ruled by a Republican-appointed justice. “The court hereby decrees that the six…
続きを読む »
Illinois Parts Ways With Supreme Court on Climate Change: ‘Illinois Leaders Must Resist These Calls To Go Backward’The court ruled Thursday by a 6-3 vote that the Clean Air Act does not give the Environmental Protection Agency broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants that contribute to global warming.
続きを読む »
Supreme Court decision may slow transition to cleaner energyThe Supreme Court ruling limiting the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants could have far-reaching consequences for the energy sector.
続きを読む »
Fifth Ward residents concerned about impact from SCOTUS' ruling on emissions: 'This is what we get?'The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the fossil fuel industry, saying the Environmental Protection Agency doesn't have broad authority to regulate national energy policy.
続きを読む »