Editorial: Supreme Court denies due process rights for some asylum seekers (via latimesopinion)
There are practical arguments — including fear of overloading the federal court system — for making it harder to game the asylum process and delay rightful deportations, but denying people the right to have a federal court review the government’s decision is not the way to do it.
The administration ordered Thuraissigiam’s expedited removal under the provisions of a 1996 federal immigration law. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the law was unconstitutional because it violated asylum seekers’ right to due process, but the Supreme Court disagreed., Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Supreme Court Rules Asylum Seekers Cannot Challenge Deportation in CourtIt's an unfortunate win for the Trump administration.
続きを読む »
Supreme Court 2020: Major rulings on abortion, Trump's tax returns still to comeHere’s a look at the major Supreme Court cases still pending, and the significant rulings so far:
続きを読む »
Supreme Court delivers win for Trump in case over speedy deportationThe Supreme Court sided 7-2 with President Donald Trump on Thursday in a case over a federal law that substantially limits the role that courts can play in reviewing deportation decisions in certain cases under a streamlined process known as 'expedited removal.'
続きを読む »
Supreme Court rules asylum seeker cannot challenge removalIn a win for the Department of Homeland Security, the Supreme Court said Thursday that a Sri Lankan farmer who lost his bid for asylum in the United States after immigration officials ordered his removal could not challenge that decision in federal court.
続きを読む »
Supreme Court allows quick removal of asylum-seekersThe case represented a crucial test of the Trump administration's effort to speed removal of thousands of migrants without federal court hearings.
続きを読む »