Susan B. Glasser on the oral arguments Donald Trump’s legal team gave before the Supreme Court and the state Trump trial regarding hush-money payments.
On Thursday, Trump’s legal team asked the Supreme Court to take this both literally and seriously, advancing his fantastical claims about an unfettered Presidency in oral arguments at the Court, where, alarmingly, they received a respectful hearing.
By the end of the nearly two hours and forty minutes of oral arguments, it seemed likely that the outcome would not so much vindicate Trump’s outlandish claims as provide the further delay that he has sought. Several conservative Justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts, specifically raised the option of sending the case back to the lower courts, perhaps to set a clearer standard dividing non-prosecutable official acts from prosecutable private actions.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Supreme Court Would Look 'Harshly' at Donald Trump Gag Order: Legal AnalystJonathan Turley says a recent gag order imposed on Donald Trump by Judge Juan Merchan has 'major constitutional problems.'
続きを読む »
The Supreme Court’s hardest case yet in Donald Trump’s legal sagaThere’s a reasonable compromise the justices can come to on whether Jan. 6 defendants can be charged with obstruction of an official proceeding.
続きを読む »
Why the Supreme Court Can't Solve All of Donald Trump's Legal ProblemsThe Supreme Court could side with Trump and hand him a major legal win, but his trial in Manhattan could continue to be an issue.
続きを読む »
Donald Trump's Former Lawyer Backs Jack Smith in Supreme Court FightIndividuals appointed in five different presidential administrations urged the Supreme Court to reject Trump's immunity request.
続きを読む »
Jack Smith tells Supreme Court to reject Donald Trump's claim of absolute immunity: 'Unprecedented'Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to reject former President Donald Trump's claim of absolute immunity.
続きを読む »
Supreme Court to review feds' use of obstruction charge against Jan. 6 defendants, Donald TrumpThe fate of hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants lies with the Supreme Court, which will hear a case Tuesday arguing that the obstruction law under which they were charged was never meant to apply to the attack on the U.S. Capitol.
続きを読む »