In 2005, the high court declined to hear a Dallas architecture firm’s appeal in a case accusing Trammell Crow Residential Co. of misusing copyrighted building...
Trammell Crow Residential was founded in 1977, part of the real estate empire created by Harlan Crow’s father, Trammell Crow. During the time when the architecture firm’s case was making its way through the courts in the early 2000s, Crow Holdings, a privately owned development and investment firm that manages the Crow family’s capital, held less than a 50% stake in Trammell Crow Residential, and wasn’t involved in its operations, Harlan Crow’s office told Bloomberg.
Thomas didn’t respond to questions submitted to a Supreme Court spokesperson and a personal representative.detailed how Crow, a longtime donor to Republican political campaigns and conservative causes, has bestowed lavish trips on Thomas for more than two decades. By their own accounts, the two men had been friends for at least eight years when the architecture firm’s petition reached the Supreme Court in 2004.
Given Crow’s status as “a close friend and a generous benefactor,” Thomas should have recused himself from cases where he knew or should have known that Crow had a direct financial interest, Hellman said. But he said it seemed unlikely that the justice would have been on notice or had reason to investigate the architecture firm’s petition at the time, he said.
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Sen. Wyden asks billionaire Harlan Crow for list of gifts to Supreme Court Justice ThomasSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has faced criticism for weeks over a report that Republican billionaire donor Harlan Crow treated him to luxury trips.
続きを読む »
Supreme court declines oil companies' request to shift climate suits to federal courtThe U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear arguments from oil companies on why a...
続きを読む »
What’s next for abortion pill after Supreme Court’s orderhe court’s action almost certainly will leave access to mifepristone unchanged at least into next year, as appeals play out, including a potential appeal to the high court.
続きを読む »
US Supreme Court protects access to abortion pillThe Supreme Court on Friday protected access to a widely used abortion drug by freezing lower-court rulings that placed restrictions on medication abortion.
続きを読む »
What's next for abortion pill after Supreme Court's orderThe court’s action almost certainly will leave access to mifepristone unchanged at least into next year, as appeals play out, including a potential appeal to the high court.
続きを読む »
Opinion | The Supreme Court delivers a sigh of relief — and an outrageous dissentOpinion by Jennifer Rubin: The Supreme Court delivers a sigh of relief — and an outrageous dissent
続きを読む »