Ashley Oliver is a Justice Department reporter for the Washington Examiner. She previously covered Congress and campaigns for Breitbart News. Originally from Fredericksburg, Virginia, she graduated from Virginia Tech with a degree in classics and philosophy before spending six years in Massachusetts working in the real estate industry.
The Supreme Court revealed on Tuesday it would not hear an appeal from coal executive Don Blankenship, who sued several major media companies for defamation after they referred to him as a"convicted felon" after he was convicted of a misdemeanor.
Attorneys for Blankenship, a Republican who sought to challenge Sen. Joe Manchin in 2018, wrote that the outlets"derailed candidacy" by publishing the inaccurate information that he was convicted of a felony.Citing the 1964 ruling in New York Times Co. v.
That standard required a public official to prove that a media outlet acted"with knowledge that was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not."
日本 最新ニュース, 日本 見出し
Similar News:他のニュース ソースから収集した、これに似たニュース記事を読むこともできます。
Supreme Court declines to revisit landmark libel ruling, though Clarence Thomas wants to reconsider the decisionThe Supreme Court declined on Tuesday to revisit the landmark First Amendment decision in New York Times v. Sullivan, rebuffing a request to take another look at decades-old precedent that created …
続きを読む »
UK Supreme Court Weighs If It's Lawful for Britain to Send Asylum-seekers to RwandaThe British government's contentious policy to stem the flow of migrants faces one of its toughest challenges this week as the U.K. Supreme Court weighs whether it's lawful to send asylumseekers to Rwanda. The Conservative government is challenging a Court of Appeal ruling...
続きを読む »
Christian baker faces new lawsuit over gender-transition cake after Supreme CourtMasterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips will have his day at the Colorado Supreme Court, which he says is the 'light at the end of the tunnel' after over 11 years in court.
続きを読む »
Supreme Court could drop California's shield for doctors who mail abortion pillsCalifornia's new law protecting in-state doctors and pharmacists who prescribe and provide the abortion pill to out-of-state patients could be upended by the Supreme Court if the justices choose to review the Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone.
続きを読む »
How the 19th Century Supreme Court Set Us on a Path to AuthoritarianismIn 1883, the Supreme Court refused to do away with racial segregation. And that’s helped set the stage for today’s massive resistance to multiracial power.
続きを読む »
The 'soft dictatorship' of this Supreme CourtWith the nine justices reconvened for the fall term, SFGATE columnist Drew Magary is here to remind us all to stay angry and demand change.
続きを読む »